How is the silo risk score calculated?

Four dimensions — integration sprawl, reconciliation load, operational cost, and entity governance — are each scored from your inputs and averaged into a score out of 100 with a low, moderate, or high band.

Is this a formal data audit?

No. It is a browser-side planning estimate built from the inputs you provide, not an operational or compliance assessment. Use it to frame where a deeper review should start.

Is my system inventory uploaded anywhere?

No. The scoring runs entirely in your browser and nothing is uploaded.

How do I lower the silo risk score?

The score falls as point-to-point connections are replaced by shared interfaces, reconciliation becomes less frequent, and more entities are trusted and reused instead of duplicated. Start with the entity that is duplicated in the most systems.

Data silo audit

A data silo is a set of business data held in one system or team that other systems cannot reliably access or reconcile with.

Score data silo risk from system sprawl, point-to-point integrations, reconciliation effort and duplicated entities. Free, and it runs in your browser.

Browser-sideNo accountCopy, download, or print

Last reviewed 30 Oct 2026

Your inputs are saved as a draft in this browser only. Nothing is uploaded.

Jump to result

Result

Silo risk score62 / 100

Risk bandModerate silo risk

Integration risk88 / 100

Reconciliation risk45 / 100

Est. reconciliation load32 hrs/week

Trusted vs duplicated entities2 trusted / 3 duplicated

Foundational processes exist but do not scale. Governed canonical entities would reduce reconciliation load and accelerate application delivery.

Browser-side planning estimate from the inputs provided; not an operational or compliance assessment.

Risk dimensions

Dimension	Score	Level
Integration sprawl	88	High
Reconciliation load	45	Moderate
Operational cost	55	Moderate
Entity governance	60	Moderate

Reported pain points

Pain point
Manual reconciliation
Late inventory visibility
Multiple product masters

Data silo audit
Silo risk score: 62 / 100
Risk band: Moderate silo risk
Integration risk: 88 / 100
Reconciliation risk: 45 / 100
Est. reconciliation load: 32 hrs/week
Trusted vs duplicated entities: 2 trusted / 3 duplicated

Foundational processes exist but do not scale. Governed canonical entities would reduce reconciliation load and accelerate application delivery.
Browser-side planning estimate from the inputs provided; not an operational or compliance assessment.

Data silo audit
Silo risk score: 62 / 100
Risk band: Moderate silo risk
Integration risk: 88 / 100
Reconciliation risk: 45 / 100
Est. reconciliation load: 32 hrs/week
Trusted vs duplicated entities: 2 trusted / 3 duplicated

Foundational processes exist but do not scale. Governed canonical entities would reduce reconciliation load and accelerate application delivery.
Browser-side planning estimate from the inputs provided; not an operational or compliance assessment.

How to use it

Enter the systems holding operational data, the point-to-point integration count, and the dominant connection pattern.
Set the reconciliation frequency, reconciliation FTEs, discrepancy impact score, and whether apps or AI use cases are delayed.
List trusted reusable entities, duplicated entities, and pain points, one per line.
Generate the audit to read the silo risk score, risk band, and the four risk dimensions, then copy the result.

Questions

How is the silo risk score calculated?: Four dimensions — integration sprawl, reconciliation load, operational cost, and entity governance — are each scored from your inputs and averaged into a score out of 100 with a low, moderate, or high band.
Is this a formal data audit?: No. It is a browser-side planning estimate built from the inputs you provide, not an operational or compliance assessment. Use it to frame where a deeper review should start.
Is my system inventory uploaded anywhere?: No. The scoring runs entirely in your browser and nothing is uploaded.
How do I lower the silo risk score?: The score falls as point-to-point connections are replaced by shared interfaces, reconciliation becomes less frequent, and more entities are trusted and reused instead of duplicated. Start with the entity that is duplicated in the most systems.